Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind energy and hot water
 
Special offer
NEW - Green Deal Of The Day! Save 50 - 90% on earth friendly products!
::
Buy castile soap and save! Learn more about uses for eco friendly castile soap
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. Uses for eucalyptus oil
  4. Handy borax tips
  5. Recycling styrofoam
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Castile soap
  8. 30 baking soda tips
  9. White bread vs brown bread
  10. 24 handy lemon tips
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 
Green Living Tips on Twitter
 
Green Living Tips on Facebook

 
bookmark or share this page
 »  Home  »  Blogs  »  Tar sands oil sourced gas boycott
Tar sands oil sourced gas boycott
By Green Living Tips | Published  02/14/2010
Production from Alberta, Canada's "oil sands" is continuing to expand and with it comes an increase in greenhouse gas emissions and other negative impacts on the boreal forest environment.

"Oil sands" is the popular term used, but it's a little misleading as it alludes to the extraction of oil to involve a filtering process - tar sands is a more accurate label.

In tar sands oil extraction, natural gas (and lots of it) is used to heat water to create the steam required to separate the bitumen from the sand. The bitumen then requires a great deal of further refining. It takes two to four tons of landscape to be dug up to extract a single barrel of oil and up to 4 barrels of water are needed to produce one barrel of synthetic crude.

According to an entry on Wikipedia, around 1.0 – 1.25 gigajoules of energy is required to extract a barrel of bitumen from the tar sands and upgrade it to synthetic crude. The energy value of a barrel of synthetic crude is approximately 6 gigajoules - so up to 20% of a barrel of tar sands oil's energy is in its production.

FuelEconomy.gov states only about 15% of the energy from the fuel we pour into our vehicles actually propels us forward and allows us to run accessories such as lights and air conditioning. The rest of the energy is lost to engine and driveline inefficiencies and idling.

Between the inefficiency of tar sands extraction and that of our cars and how we drive them, this synthetic crude oil comes at a huge environmental price vs. what is returned.

Environment Canada says the tar sands projects make up 5% of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, which is pretty incredible considering all forms of activity that generate greenhouse gas emissions in the entire nation.

The following are some of the companies involved in Alberta's tar sands oil production:

Alberta Oilsands Inc
Canadian Oil Sands Limited
ConocoPhillips Oil Sand Partnership II
Imperial Oil Resources
Mocal Energy Limited
Murphy Oil Company Ltd.,
Nexen Oil Sands Partnership
Petro-Canada Oil and Gas (Suncor Energy)
Royal Dutch Shell (Shell)

While its easy to point the finger and "tch tch" at Canada for this destruction, much of the demand for the tar sands oil is coming from elsewhere - the USA. If there was no demand, there would be no tar sands exploitation.

It was encouraging to read about two major green retailers (Whole Foods Market Ltd and Bed, Bath and Beyond) making moves to boycott tar sands oil sourced gas and more companies look set to follow.

While gas is a necessary evil in most of our lives for the time being, we can play our part in minimizing demand of tar sands oil by a) reducing the amount of gas we consume b) not buying gas from companies associated with tar sands oil extraction and c) letting the companies involved know our concerns and actions.

However, with so many gas brands around, you may need to contact the head office of the brand you usually buy and ask the pointed question:

"Is X gas/petrol in whole or in part produced from oil extracted from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada?".

..it's a simple question with only two possible answers - yes or no. It's probably safe to assume no response at all as meaning the latter as does long and convoluted answers that state neither.

Even if you're not in a country where oil from Canada's tar sands is exported, by taking these actions, it helps send a message to these companies that the whole world is watching and the pillaging of Alberta's boreal forests is unacceptable.

Where things start getting very complex is all the other companies we buy products from who might be knowingly (but most likely unwittingly or don't care either way) sourcing oil/gas for their operations from the tar sands. You could spend a lot time in enquiries, but focusing on the gas you use directly is a start.

Kudos to the two retailers for putting the tar sands back in the spotlight again! The news should hopefully encourage other retailers to do the same.

With all the subsidies and tax breaks fossil fuel companies still receive, it makes you wonder what could happen if electric vehicles and renewable energy were given the same level of support. Peak oil is no longer a fantasy or a maybe - it's here; as is evident by the rush to squeeze it from Canada's boreal forests.

Update February 15 : Bah! It seems now that Canada is looking to China and other Asian countries to take this tar sands oil if the US won't; so on top of all the destruction, add to that transporting the stuff to far flung places. :(. C'mon Canada, you're better than this!




Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Archived/old comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by eric in canada)

    it's a lovely thought to think that that the oil tar sands is a big bad nasty thing that boycotting will make go away in a hurry.

    Outside of most of the major players in that development being multinationals who pay their stockholders (maybe even your pension plan or mutual fund) dividends of cash...

    Outside of the fact that apparently Canadian oil and gas exports supply more than 50% of USA needs....

    ya now, it couldn't be sold if nobody wanted to buy it., but buy it they do, and if it ain't USA consumers, other countries are waiting in line...

    such is the marketplace. Oil and gas imports into the usa have been referred to by past presidents as an issue of national security. ....but Walgrens don't want their suppliers to us oil-sands oil. How Bizarre!!! What to think???

    Two extremes in policy, kinda epitomizes "mixed messages" doncha think....

    And the icing on the cake? The gulf of mexico fiasco....Canadian technology to deal with oil spills couldn't be used to mediate damage as it hadn't been approved south of the border, but multinationals want to drill in the arctic, where it could be 8 months or more before disaster response ships could even get there.....sweet eh?

    I think that the knee-jerk reactions looking for villains in the oil sands players should look long and hard at the local spectrum.....why not boycott all pizza companies who deliver, cause all odds are that they are using Canadian oil from the oilsands...

    And I betcha Walgrens uses a delivery service that uses the same gas and oil.....cause it really ain't likely that "XXX delivery service" doesn't have a clue where their fuel and lubricants came from, and likely don't give a hoot either.

    Meanwhile, the "boycott Alberta" initiative by the activists hurts the ma and pa tourism, even eco-tourism operators. But, you can still get yer pizza delivered in Manhatten....

    The oil/tar sands folks are getting the "clean up" message, and methinks that the Alberta Govt is dealing with issues on a greener perspective. That is an upside to this debacle.

    We ain't all villans up here in the GWN, many of the corporate decisions come from head offices in other countries...including the USA...

    There's a ton of greenies up here, and they are quite active. There is nothing wrong with others stirring the pot a tad, but keep a perspective on the "balance"

    I watch the newscasts from both USA and Canada and I cannot for the life of me understand the aggressive level of diatribe directed towards the oil/tar sands (not that it hasn't had SOME positive effects), but when compared to the gulf oil disaster, which may have the potential to affect the whole ecosystem of the N. American continent, the difference in reaction is so incongruous that it makes me wonder if the oil/tar sands is not being used as a distraction from US domestic issues...lack of oversight, due diligence etc....

    Much easier to

    Blame Canada

    eh?

    And our health care system ain't a threat either. Freak, even Sarah Pallin said that her family used to send them to Canada for health care....
     
  • Comment submission link (no longer in use - please use new form above)