Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
bookmark or share this page
Green News Blog
Environmental stories, opinion pieces and site news
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind and hot water
 
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. 30 baking soda tips
  4. White bread vs brown bread
  5. 24 handy lemon tips
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Handy borax tips
  8. Castile soap
  9. Dealing with dog poop
  10. Versatile vinegar tips
No popular articles found.
Special offer
Buy castile soap and save - special offer for GLT readers! Learn more about the many uses for earth friendly castile soap
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 »  Home  »  Blogs  »  Desalination vs. recycled sewage
Desalination vs. recycled sewage
By Green Living Tips | Published  05/10/2008

After writing about a desalination plant under construction in Adelaide, a reader pointed out to me that it would be much more energy efficient and  environmentally friendly to recycle sewage and stormwater runoff.

A recent report investigating the viability of using treated sewage and piping it to reservoirs found that not only could 100 billion litres of drinking water be obtained from the treatment plant in question annually, but that it would cost about 60% of the price of building a seawater desalination plant producing the same amount.

I guess the biggest problem facing this sort of water reclamation is public perception. I'm sure desalination is a much easier sell to the electorate than is recycled pee.

Drinking what was someone else's urine doesn't really have me saying "yay team!" either, but I guess we need to face the facts that this sort of recycling may be the only option unless we want to end up like the characters in the book, "Dune".

Dune was a series I read when I was a kid, and is still popular today from what I gather. Basically, it involves a desert planet called Arrakis where wealth is dictated in part by how much water you owned. The people of Arrakis wore "still suits" that recycle and filter their waste and perspiration into drinkable water. When someone dies, their water content is extracted and distributed to their relatives.

It all sounds pretty extreme and far fetched I guess, but is it? While Planet Earth has a stack of water, easily accessible potable (drinking) water is comparitively scarce, and getting scarcer due to global warming and other forms of human interference with water systems. The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations has warned that within the next two decades, 66% of the earth's population could face serious water shortages

Maybe it's time that we all started rethinking some of these "icky" solutions to what is looking to be a major challenge for humanity in the not too distant future; after all, water is something that we can hardly do without.
Related:

Simple water saving tips

bookmark or share this page
 
Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by Mike)

    You touch on a very important point: one of the major hindrances to adjusting for the future is public perception. From my personal experience, it seems a certain segment of the population is automatically counter to what they perceive as "green." Now, imagine that mode of thinking coupled with the thought of drinking recycled urine. I think a lot of the necessary implementation of new technologies and regulations will probably be followed by a considerable lag in public support. Just as important as the research and development is for new, sustainable technologies, is the need for a public education campaign. If I hear one more quip about [climate change theory/hybrids/solar power/etc.] being part of a UN secret plot, I swear . . .
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Jesse Hudson)

    The single biggest issue facing us to day is the shortage of fresh water for people to drink. The race is on for large corporations to privatize our water services so it then becomes for profit when we use our taps. In Canada oil production takes 2 to 4 barrels of water to produce one barrel of oil so that is 3 to 4.5 million barrels of water per day the answer is to cut our oil dependency. Industrial farming uses great amounts of water so again we need to buy local. Bottled water has a huge impact on the environment only 5% of the bottles in the world are recycled and in North America it takes 1.4 million barrels of oil to produce the bottles for what we consume here.If you would like to learn more on water issues look up Maude Barlow, she is a Canadian author and has written books on the subject.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Maggie Lawton)

    Just a comment on desalination versus sewage recycling. I suspect it is horses for courses. Both use the same methodology, reverse osmosis, and the cost of either approach will be very situation dependent. Reverse osmosis is much more energy efficient today then it was a couple of decades ago so the environmental impacts is lessened for both approaches. I think Australia shouldn't discount either sewage recycling or seawater desalination and decide on what is the most suitable for any given situation. One thing for sure is that unless people's usage patterns change considerably, some form of reverse osmosis technology wil be required whether people like it or not.
     
  • Submit Comment (reviewed before publishing)