Tips categories
Articles with planet-saving tips to help protect the environment we all affect!
Green News Blog
Environmental stories, opinion pieces and site news
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind and hot water
 
Article Options

bookmark or share this page
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. 30 baking soda tips
  4. White bread vs brown bread
  5. 24 handy lemon tips
  6. Dealing with dog poop
  7. Versatile vinegar tips
  8. White sugar vs raw sugar
  9. Handy borax tips
  10. Uses for olive oil
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 »  Home  »  water  »  Nanocosmetics
Nanocosmetics
By Green Living Tips | Published  04/8/2007 | water , health , family
Nanocosmetics - human and environmental toxins?

Nano-technology has increasingly made its way into the cosmetics industry. The effect of the use of nanoparticles in cosmetic compounds we apply to our skin, including sunscreen, is creating concerns related to human health and environmental issues.

Nanotechnology involves the creation of compounds that are incredibly small; measuring  under 100 nanometers. To put that in perspective, a human hair is around 100,000 nanometers wide, so we're talking about substances less than one thousandth the width of a human hair.

The use of nanocosmetics means that the cosmetic isn't just sitting on your skin, but can penetrate much deeper.

Due to a lack of regulation in most countries, the cosmetics you use may contain nano-materials and this may not be noted on the label. Nano-technology is not only being used in cosmetics, but also in sunscreens. Given that our governments promote the use of sunscreen to prevent skin cancer, this is worrying indeed.

The world’s oldest scientific organization, the Royal Society, advised in 2004 that as the possible toxicity of nanoparticles cannot be based on equivalent larger sized particles, they should be classified as new chemicals and undergo a full safety assessment. It's my understanding that no such assessment has been carried out anywhere in the world.

One of the problems of nanocosmetic materials is that many small particles have a combined overall larger surface area than the equivalent weight in non-nano materials; hence, the potential to be a good deal more toxic. Added to this, nanoparticles can be more easily absorbed  by biological membranes, cells, tissues and organs that larger sized particles can't. Once nanoparticles are in the body, they can be easily transported around it.

In relation to the environment, very little research has been done; but ask yourself this - where do cosmetics and sunscreens usually wind up? We usually wash them off. Given the minute size of these particles, they can easily pass through any filtering system to wind up in our waterways and ultimately affect the entire food chain.

Exposure to nanoscale aluminum, which is used in sunscreen, has already been found to retard the growth of roots in a number of plant species. Carbon fullerenes, used in some facial creams and moisturizers, have also been found to kill water fleas and bacteria (bear in mind that some bacteria are good).

There's just so much we don't know about the broader effects of nanocosmetics on humans and the environment. It's reminiscent of the days when asbestos was used extensively and took so many years for the dangers to be exposed.

Given there's an element of doubt, are you still happy to use cosmetic products containing nanoparticles? Do you know if any are in your sunscreen, face cream and other cosmetics? If you're not sure, call the company and asked them the pointed question: "Does X contain nanoparticles?"

Better still, why take the risk that the company will be truthful? Perhaps consider switching to a well known environmentally friendly cosmetic range.

bookmark or share this page
 
Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Comments