Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind energy and hot water
 
Special offer
NEW - Green Deal Of The Day! Save 50 - 90% on earth friendly products!
::
Buy castile soap and save! Learn more about uses for eco friendly castile soap
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. Uses for eucalyptus oil
  4. Handy borax tips
  5. Recycling styrofoam
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Castile soap
  8. 30 baking soda tips
  9. White bread vs brown bread
  10. 24 handy lemon tips
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 
Green Living Tips on Twitter
 
Green Living Tips on Facebook

 
bookmark or share this page
 »  Home  »  food  »  Trans fats alternatives
Trans fats alternatives
By Green Living Tips | Published  01/3/2007 | food
Trans fats and chemical vs. enzyme interesterification

Trans fats in foods are on the way out; it's good news for consumer health, but the environment may suffer with some of the alternatives being used to ensure we continue to get our so called "heart friendly" fatty fixes.

While trans fats might occur naturally in very small amounts in some meat and dairy products, the bulk of trans fats consumed today are made by partial hydrogenation (infusing with hydrogen) of vegetable oils. Trans fats have proven to increase bad types of cholesterol, which then leads to increased risk of coronary disease.

Consumer uproar has many companies scrambling for "healthier" fat alternatives that will maintain the taste, texture and flavor of foods, while also allowing for reasonable shelf life; plus satisfying the food industry's need for a basic ingredient that's stable, easy to work with and store. 

Enter chemical interesterification.

Yes, it's quite a mouthful!

Chemical interesterification is the process of blending fully hydrogenated oils (saturated fats) with unsaturated oils. A chemical catalyst (accelerant) is one of the elements used to help achieve this, along with copious quantities of water. While the end product is free of trans fatty acids, the catalysts and process aren't exactly earth friendly.

The most common chemical catalysts used are sodium methylate (methoxide) or sodium ethylate (ethoxylate). Both of these are extremely corrosive chemicals that react violently with acids and water. They can also combine with other elements to form various environmental toxins.

With the chemical interesterification, there is also a great deal of oil waste and excessive water usage.

All so we can put more fat in our bodies :).

The greener interesterification alternative?

Some companies have been making great strides in a process called Enzymatic interesterification.

Enzymes are proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. Through the utilization of these proteins, the enzymatic interesterification process doesn't need harsh chemical catalysts and therefore eliminates toxic byproducts, air pollutants and other forms of waste. While the technology has been around for decades, it's been cost prohibitive and enzyme stability has been an issue up until recently.

Two companies now marketing the technology, Novozymes and ADM, state that they have solved the cost and stability issue and claim that their enzymatic interesterification method has the potential to save hundreds of million pounds of soybean oil, eliminate 20 million pounds of sodium methoxide, 116 million pounds of soaps, 50 million pounds of bleaching clay, and 60 million gallons of water annually compared to interesterification process using harsh chemicals.

It all sounds very positive and I hope that the technology is used by increasing numbers of food producers; but it begs the question - how will the consumer know which process is used? Will there be an indication on the label? Trans fats somewhat hid their presence in many products behind the "partially hydrogenated vegetable oil" ingredient notation for many years. We can only hope that the food industry and government does their bit by forcing correct and accurate labelling.

If in doubt about an ingredient of any product, run a search on the web or call the manufacturer; they do have an obligation to their customers to respond honestly to pointed questions about their produce. If the manufacturer seems evasive or vague about the health or environmental impact of their goods, chances are they are trying to hide something.




Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Related Articles

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Archived/older comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Gareth Barnes)

    I currently work as a process engineer in the Fats and oils business and as such I would like to bring this article up to date.

    A little background on fats to help with the understanding of the processes, so here we go. A vegetable fat is made up of a glycerol molecule to which three fatty acid molecule chains are attached. These fatty acids can have different length carbon chains and varying numbers of double bonds (the less double bonds the more saturated the oil and the higher the melting point).

    During the Interesterification process these fatty acids are disconnected from the glycerol backbone and randomly re-attached again. Hence if you have two different oils in a blend you end up with oil with a random distribution of triglycerides (the overall fat molecule). So as you can see it is a little more than just mixing the oils and is in fact a chemical randomisation process that modifies the melting point of the fat.

    In industry currently (from my experience at one of the biggest plants in the world) NO HYDROGENATED fats are used during the Interesterification process, instead we use blends of tropical oils (Palm Coconut) and fractions thereof and occasionally these are blended with liquid oils such as rape seed and sunflower before Interesterification. The whole point of the process is to avoid hydrogenated fats (although their use is feasible).

    In chemical IE sodium methylate is almost exclusively used in industry. Most modern chemical IE plants use the dry process and as such there is no effluent stream. The by-product of the reaction is methyl ester, this is perfectly safe and is commonly used in animal feed (it is also known as bio diesel). This by-product is completely removed in the following step of the process. There are a few other possible reactions, but these are inhibited by simple control of the process parameters.

    Enzymatic Interesterification is a relatively new technology, but the overall goal is the same to randomise the fatty acids chains. There are a few benefits to the process, but there are a few drawbacks also (I won't go into these as they are basically and economic issue). But one thing there is to remember and that is an Enzyme is just a complex chemical that has been produced by genetically modified bacterium.

    So are the processes really that different from a chemical use standpoint?

    I will let you decide

     
Comment submission link (no longer in use - please use new form above)