Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
bookmark or share this page
Green News Blog
Environmental stories, opinion pieces and site news
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind and hot water
 
Special offer
20% off green cleaning products!  Wowgreen's range is  environment, family and pet safe!
::
Buy castile soap and save - special offer for GLT readers! Learn more about the many uses for castile soap
Article Options

bookmark or share this page
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. Castile soap
  4. Handy borax tips
  5. 30 baking soda tips
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. White bread vs brown bread
  8. Recycling styrofoam
  9. 24 handy lemon tips
  10. Uses for eucalyptus oil
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 »  Home  »  food  »  Meat consumption statistics
Meat consumption statistics
By Green Living Tips | Published  05/19/2009 | food
How much meat do we eat? Consumption statistics
As I was driving out in the country recently, I looked out over hills that were totally denuded of native vegetation - just pastures and paddocks, most of them growing fodder for livestock.

To some it would have been an idyllic rural view and while it's far better than seeing factories for as far as the eye can see; it's a shame that a landscape that remained pretty much unchanged for thousands of years has fallen so quickly to cater to our desire for meat.

The usual disclaimer - I eat meat and even with recent reductions, I fully acknowledge it's still too much. Articles I write on the topic of meat are just another way for me to come to grips with the scale of the issue, to drive home the fact that it's something I and many others really do need to change if we can.

In my article on reducing meat consumption, I outline some of the environmental issues associated with meat eating - and they are quite shocking. Another item on the cruelty aspect of some factory farms challenges us to meet our meat.

A good way to get our heads around the issue is to compare what was then with what is now and gain an idea of exactly how much we're consuming. Here's some interesting statistics I dug up.

USA

In 1970 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in the USA:

Beef: ~ 80 pounds
Chicken: ~ 27 pounds
Pork: ~ 54 pounds
Turkey: ~ 7 pounds

A total of 168 pounds (around 76 kilograms) per year.

In 2005 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in the USA:

Beef: ~ 63 pounds
Chicken: ~ 60 pounds
Pork: ~ 48 pounds
Turkey: ~ 14 pounds

A total of 185 pounds (around 84 kilograms) per year.

Growth: 17 pounds

This information was sourced from the USDA. Going back further to the 1950's, meat consumption was under the 100 pound mark per capita. While 17 pounds more may not seem like a lot, multiply that by a population of 300 million.

Australia

In 1968/69 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in Australia:

Beef and Veal: 40 kilograms
Poultry: 8.3 kilograms
Pork: 6.7 kilograms
Lamb and Mutton: 36.4 kilograms

A total of 91.4 kilograms (around 200 pounds) per year.

In 2005/06 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in Australia:

Beef and Veal: 36.7 kilograms
Poultry: 38 kilograms
Pork: 22.2 kilograms
Lamb and Mutton: 13 kilograms

A total of 109.9 kilograms (around 242 pounds) per year.

Growth: 18.5 kilograms. 

These statistics were sourced from the Victorian Department of Primary Industry. It seems like an incredible amount, but thinking back to my "meat and three meats" days; I'm sure I would have chomped my way through at least that much.

UK

I had some difficulty finding "apples to apples" (for want of a better term) statistics for the UK, but consumption of poultry meat appears to have doubled over the past 20 years, while red meat and pork consumption has remained static.  Britons' overall meat consumption is now 50 per cent higher than it was 40 years ago.

Canada

In 1969 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in Canada

Red meat  (boneless weight) : 48.63 kilograms
Poultry  (boneless weight) : 13.70 kilograms

A total of 62.33 kilograms (around 137 pounds) per year

In 2005 the averages for annual meat consumption per capita in Canada

Red meat  (boneless weight) : 39.34 kilograms
Poultry  (boneless weight) : 23.27 kilograms

A total of 62.61 kilograms (around 137 pounds) per year.

These statistics were sourced from Statistics Canada

Take a bow Canada, but not too deep as as the global average in 2003 was 38 kg (around 84 pounds) per person according to the report "Global Production and Consumption of Animal Source Foods" from the United Nations.

According to the Food Ethics Council, The UN also projects global meat consumption and production to rise as population and incomes increase in poorer nations. By 2050, it's expected meat demand will be twice the 229 million tonnes the world ate in 2000.

Is that even possible given the environmental issues posed by the livestock industry now? Something has to give.

What sort of conditions will these animals have to live in given that so many of them will be factory farm raised? Imagine the methane production (methane is another potent greenhouse gas).

Imagine all those animals being slaughtered, some of them in terrible ways. Imagine all the land that will be utilized to feed our desire (over and above our needs) for meat.

Consider *all* the environmental damage being wreaked in the process.

Faced with this information and the prospect of a planet ringing with the screams of animals being crushed, drugged, beaten and cruelly butchered, I think we can all make an effort to reduce our meat consumption. Even if you aren't a big fan of vegetables, there's some half decent mock meat products around these days.

 
bookmark or share this page
 
Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 

 
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by abby)

    There are approximately the same number of cows today as there were buffalo before Europeans came to America. (60 million)

    I recommend buying from small, local farms. And expanding your options of what types of meat you eat. I used to live near an ostrich ranch and bought meat strait from the ranch owner. You could see how the animals were kept, know what they ate, etc.

    I grew up in northwestern Kansas. Out there, farmers cut & bale the grass in the ditches by the road for animal hay. This saves the county money since they don't have to pay someone to mow, and is also benefitial to farmers. Also, farming/food production industries really do support each other. Almost nothing goes to waste. For example, a company that makes apple cider will sell the crushed apple pulp to farmers to use as livestock feed.

    Another thing we need to think about is natural habitats. If ALL the land was used for farming crops, wild animals would have no place to live. Pastures also are homes to many wild animals.

    I personally prefer to eat local meat from independent farmers. Or hunted meat, where I know the animal has lived a free life rather than in a cage.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Jill)

    I too have tried to reduce my meat consumption, getting more serious about it within the last couple months. The great thing about me deciding to reduce my consumption is that my whole household will also consume less meat. I've recently started scouring the internet for some good recipes that take advantage of beans and lentils. They're out there, and they're tasty too! not to mention most tend to be low fat and high fiber!! :)
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Trudy Lundy)

    I gave up meat over 15 years ago as I saw cattle in feedlots standing on manure piles eating GMO corn that if they weren't marketed in 6 months it would usually kill them. No exercise, no grass, growth hormones, antibiotics and now E Coli shots. I'm glad I gave it up long ago. We could feed lots more people if we weren't feeding so many livestock!
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Jim)

    Any wonder why the U.S.A. is the sickest country in the world with internal problems such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity....The medical industry must love the meat industry and all the animal byproducts we consume. Money in the bank for them.
    It takes 16 pounds of grain to produce 1 pound of beef. What a waste of land!
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Amanda Feely)

    The first poster really hit it when they said the farming industry has little waste. They evolved that way because they couldn't afford to at a point. We've evolved away from the farmers we used to be and more into industry. As for the last poster, they mentioned that the entirety of the medical professionals back the meat industry. Our doctor doesn't. She's a mainstream doctor who went veg to lose weight and still is veg. It's a lifestyle for her now. More often than not, she tells people to go veg. She doesn't eat any meat but does sometimes have a hankering for cheese (her family's largest downfall- they love cheese). Hmm... perhaps I should tell her about the almond cheese and such... it's pretty good. Anyway, she doesn't press her beliefs but when faced with a situation she knows that going veg would help, she mentions it, for sure. We do need more like her, saying how plants are generally better for us than animals, which can carry disease. Myself, I do eat meat. I eat about one to two beef product servings (aka: a steak or something) a year, about two servings of fish a month and the rest is chicken and turkey. I try to buy animal products that are labeled: cage free, fed with whole grains and such like that but you can't do that with everything. I'd buy from a small farm here, only there aren't any. They're all the large chicken farms, mostly. I'm sure I can get myself to eating less meat in the future, so long as it entails I don't eat mushrooms... gag reflex there.
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Darby)

    Hey Jim-where did you get your statistics? The average feed conversion for beef animals is 3 or 4 lbs of feed to 1 lb of gain. We are farmers and if it were 16 lbs of say corn multiplied by $4/bu (54 lbs/bu) it would cost $3.33 per pound JUST FOR CORN to produce 1 lb of meat. That means you would be paying over $4 per pound for hamburger. I'd double check your source.
     
Submit Comment (reviewed before publishing)