Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
bookmark or share this page
Green News Blog
Environmental stories, opinion pieces and site news
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind and hot water
 
Article Options

bookmark or share this page
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. 30 baking soda tips
  4. White bread vs brown bread
  5. 24 handy lemon tips
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Handy borax tips
  8. Dealing with dog poop
  9. Castile soap
  10. Versatile vinegar tips
No popular articles found.
Special offer
Buy castile soap and save - special offer for GLT readers! Learn more about the many uses for earth friendly castile soap
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 »  Home  »  repairs  »  Planned obsolescence
Planned obsolescence
By Green Living Tips | Published  06/1/2008 | repairs , home , gadgets
Planned obsolescence and the environment

In an earlier article, I wrote on the subject of perceived obsolescence and it's impact on the environment. Perceived obsolescence is basically about fashion and trends; usually steered by clever marketing.

Planned obsolescence can be equally as seedy at times in that it's implemented as a strategy by some manufacturers in order that you buy more often. Ever noticed how some items seem to die as soon as the warranty period has expired? Or that a single component costs so much to replace? It's not a coincidence, this is likely planned obsolescence and it's fueling our tendency towards hyperconsumption.

A colleague of mine worked in the washing machine industry, designing components for a major manufacturer. He told me that while the machines generally were of high quality, there were certain parts designed to break down within X period of time. By spending a couple of dollars more, the same parts could last many times longer. Because the parts were specific to the machine, generic replacements were hard to come by; so customers would have pay a huge amount for the replacement - which explains why the machines were reasonably cheap to start out with.

Another colleague was an ink cartridge refiller who started out in the mid 90's in what was then a new industry. People would buy small plastic cartridge containing a piddling amount of ink and once those had run out, bin them and buy a new one. Millions upon millions of these cartridges wound up in landfill and still do today.

My enterprising pal would refill them at half the cost and offered a mobile service, visiting many businesses around town. The ink refilling industry took off and the printer companies started threatening voiding warranties if people used these refilled cartridges.

The new cartridges did and still do cost a fortune - and that's why they practically give away printers these days; the companies more than make up the cash in consumables. That's one of the reasons ink cartridges are so small - so you'll need to replace them more often.

In many instances, the use of inferior quality parts is not a case of the company trying to save money, but make it. The cost of parts is often quite close to buying a new product; so what do consumers do? Buy a new one of course.

Whether it's cars, refrigerators, entertainment systems or kitchen appliances; planned obsolescence is now the norm instead of the exception. Planned obsolescence has become so much a part of our consumption, that manufacturers aren't so concerned about you switching to another brand as it's now generally accepted "stuff ain't built like it use to be". They know the line and they stay just inside it.

Even my brand name electric shaver, a name that was usually associated with excellence has suffered the same fate. I went to replace the shaving block and screen; two small components, and found that the cost to do so was only $10 under buying the wholed darned unit!

Another trick used by manufacturers is replacement dates - recommending replacements long before the part is anywhere near worn out. Using the shaver example, the manufacturer recommends replacing the screen and block every 12 months. They even provide a sticker to put on the razor to remind you of the date. I've had the same parts now for 2 years.

The cost of planned obsolescence not only hits the consumer hard in the wallet, but also our environment and millions of components are thrown away each year; usually winding up in landfill.

Planned obsolescence became more popular in the 50's when price was everything; but I think we've got to the stage now with it that many consumers are happy to pay a few dollars more in order to get a better product that lasts longer

How do we change this trend?

Planned obsolescence is somewhat a runaway train now unfortunately. There is little that we can do as individuals except to write to companies asking them to improve their quality and that we are prepared to pay more if they do so. If enough people take this action, maybe things will change.

The other thing we can do is to treat manufacturer replacement date recommendations with suspicion, unless of course it's a safety issue.

Additionally, when something seems broken or depleted, use the power of the web to find alternatives or perhaps a cheap fix - a great example are the ink cartridges I mentioned earlier. Instead of throwing these environmental nasties out, you can buy refill kits that will save you a ton of cash and literally help save tons of cartridges going into landfill.

Finally, and the most important thing we can do is to look after the stuff we own a little better. Items tend to wear out faster if they aren't maintained and we've generally become lazy.

Gone are the days of manufacturers providing us with oodles of information for maintenance, unless of course it's going to make them money. Little things like lubricating, dusting or tightening a loose screw can extend the life of the products we buy, saving us money and also saving just that little bit more trash entering the waste stream before it really needs to.

bookmark or share this page
 
Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Tasha)

    Hi,

    Great article as usual. I totally agree. We bought a new Hoover washing machine 5 years ago for 250GBP, and at the beginning of this year, the motor and/or brushes wore out. To replace them, including labour, would have cost 200GBP. This time we've spent 3 times what we paid for the Hoover on a Miele with a 10 year parts and labour guarantee. It was a tough choice to out the old machine, and we felt really guilty - we even tried to Freecycle it, but no-one wanted it - but there was no guarantee that the machine would last longer than another 18 months, so we felt that in the long run this was the best decision. For advice on washing machines a good website is: http://www.washerhelp.co.uk/ That's where we got our info from.

    I think it should be illegal for companies to design products to break after a given length of time and that they should face criminal charges for doing so.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Tasha, thanks for your input. We had a similar experience with a vacuum cleaner. We bought a big brand name at a discount price with all the trimmings and within 2 years the unit was totally screwed - it basically just fell apart. On my next purchase, I told the sales guy I wanted durability, not gimmicks and he recommended a Miele. While it didn't have all the gadgets and was a little pricier, it's solid, quiet, not as energy hungry and the darned thing could suck start a Harley Davidzon! Miele (German brand I think?) certainly gets a thumbs up from me.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by David)

    I know that Annie Leonard has been mentioned on related posts (i.e. hyper-consumption), but I don't see her mentioned here. So I'll go ahead and take the opportunity to promote "The Story of Stuff" (www.storyofstuff.com) as a valuable source for another perspective on planned obsolescence, perceived obsolescence and hyper-consumption, or as Annie puts it "the golden arrow of consumption in the materials economy"
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Thanks David; Annie's video on consumption is certainly a must see - just describes planned and perceived obsolescenc so well.
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Mark Duncan)

    I've had a similar experience with one DVD player and one DVD recorder. In a very short time they failed to recognize blank or commercially recorded DVDs.

    I checked the manufacturers website and found no help. I did web searches and found lots of people with the same problem but no solutions until I finally found one where the writer suggested opening the unit up and cleaning the lens and it worked perfectly.

    So, if dirt is the problem and can make you throw away an entire DVD player, why don't manufacturers make it easier to access the lens for routine cleaning?
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Sheila)

    Great article, Michael!

    I do alot of pondering on how to further my ability to make a difference in my country's ill- perceived notion that once something is thrown away, it disappears- just yesterday the phrase " designed obsolescence" would not escape me. How ironic is it that THIS is the first opportunity that I've had to read this issue?

    My daughter bought a flat- top stove last year- it was broken by her cat, who decided that he needed to brush against the pasta jar above it, subsequently knocking it down onto the range top and shattering it. Since she did not buy a warranty, she could not get anyone to fix it for a reasonable price- then she found out in order to fix the range top, she would have to spend just about as much money as she would've had to if she bought an entirely new one! She bought a new one, much to my chagrin. When the new stove was only three months old, the cooktop would not turn off and actually burned hotter and hotter. The only way she was able to turn the unit off was to unplug it from the wall. Last week a service repairman came to her home to fix it (this is after she went without a stove for a month) only to be told that he needed to order some parts, sorry Ma'am, you'll have to wait longer. What a crock!

    My friend's vehicle just flat out DIED when she finished paying it off. My Dremel rotary tool can only be fixed by two factories in America, and the repair cost is almost as much as buying another one!

    In order to change my cell phone plan a few years ago, I was told that my phone was too old (even though it was working just fine for me) and that I could not increase my minutes without buying a new one.Absurd.

    I could list scenario after scenario, but I think you get it. The biggest problem that I have with perceived obsolescence is that it is a ploy to develop an "in" crowd- and those who don't have the newest gadgets or clothing or whatever are then judged as not being as good as those who do have them. (For instance, Sarah Palin's $150,000 wardrobe- kind of un-funny that the Republican National Committee deemed it necessary in the midst of an economic crisis)

    The biggest problem I have with designed obsolescence is that this is a premeditated and deliberate method to legally rip a company's own customers off while smiling in their foolish faces because they know you will be back for more. With the first yawns of the Industrial Revolution, products were being made to last.

    Unfortunately between then and now, the "innocence of the Renaissance" was lost and greed became king when companies realized that they would make lots more when people had to replace the items they sell.

    It's just disgusting that a consumer cannot openly trust any business that they interact with, and that there is (or should be)a seed of doubt experienced by most smart people when pondering such an interaction. It is a most abominable practice and should absolutely be criminally prosecuted.

    Big business should be held to account worldwide and I'm glad that more people are becoming ever- more aware of the damages that are being incurred by our planet in the name of the greed of a few. For what? So they can have fun at all of our expense? I resent the fact that big business has the ability to practically rape and sicken their customers, poor indigenous people around the world, entire ecosystems, and the Mother Earth herself. Percieved obsolescence needs new perceptions.

    Designed obsolescence needs a new design. If business wasn't taken over by hugely greedy appetites, perhaps the world wouldn't be experiencing the economic crisis we are going through while the ones who created the mess get to fly in their private jets with pretty plastic girls and say, " What recession?"

    I know that this may be a bit racy, but I am echoing the sentiments of many average Americans who want nothing more than simplicity and a quiet, green life.

    Again, thank you for your crusade. It is certainly refreshing to receive candid information that is not propagandized by big business, i.e., "Plastic saves lives". Ha!
     
Submit Comment (reviewed before publishing)