Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind energy and hot water
 
Special offer
NEW - Green Deal Of The Day! Save 50 - 90% on earth friendly products!
::
Buy castile soap and save! Learn more about uses for eco friendly castile soap
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. Uses for eucalyptus oil
  4. Handy borax tips
  5. Recycling styrofoam
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Castile soap
  8. 30 baking soda tips
  9. White bread vs brown bread
  10. 24 handy lemon tips
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 
Green Living Tips on Twitter
 
Green Living Tips on Facebook

 
bookmark or share this page
 »  Home  »  repairs  »  Planned obsolescence
Planned obsolescence
By Green Living Tips | Published  09/3/2010 | repairs , home , gadgets
Planned obsolescence and the environment

First published June 2008, updated September 2010

In an earlier article, I wrote on the subject of perceived obsolescence and its impact on the environment. Perceived obsolescence is basically about fashion and trends; usually steered by clever marketing.

Planned obsolescence can be equally as seedy at times in that it's implemented as a strategy by some (many?) manufacturers in order that you buy more often.

Ever noticed how some items seem to die as soon as the warranty period has expired? Or that a single component costs so much to replace? It's not a coincidence, this is likely planned obsolescence and it's fuelling our tendency towards hyperconsumption.

A colleague of mine worked in the washing machine industry, designing components for a major manufacturer. He told me that while the machines generally were of high quality, there were certain parts designed to break down within X period of time. If the company chose to spend a couple of dollars more, the same parts could last many times longer. Because the parts were specific to the machine, generic replacements were hard to come by; so customers would have pay a huge amount for the replacement - which explains why the machines were reasonably cheap to start out with.

Another colleague was an ink cartridge refiller who started out in the mid 90's in what was then a new industry. People would buy small plastic cartridges containing a piddling amount of ink and once those had run out, bin them and buy a new one. Millions upon millions of these cartridges wound up in landfill and still do today.

My enterprising pal would refill them at half the cost and offered a mobile service, visiting many businesses around town. The ink refilling industry took off and the printer companies started threatening voiding warranties if people used these refilled cartridges.

The new cartridges did and still do cost a fortune - and that's why they practically give away printers these days; the companies more than make up the cash in consumables. That's one of the reasons ink cartridges are so small - so you'll need to replace them more often.

Sometimes planned obsolescence isn't so much about getting you to buy high priced replacement parts, but to buy a whole new product. In many instances, the use of inferior quality parts is not just case of the company trying to save money, but make it. The cost of parts is often quite close to buying a new product; so what do consumers do when an item breaks down; particularly if the item is reasonably inexpensive to replace? Buy a new one of course. Take the example of a toaster - they are as cheap as chips these days. If a toaster manufacturer can save a dollar in parts and they sell a million units - that's a million dollars more in their pockets. Add to that the fact you may buy your next toaster from the same company and it's a great way to make a bunch of cash.

Whether it's cars, refrigerators, entertainment systems or kitchen appliances; planned obsolescence is now the norm instead of the exception. Planned obsolescence has become so much a part of our consumption, that manufacturers aren't so concerned about you switching to another brand as it's now generally accepted "stuff ain't built like it use to be". They know the line and they stay just inside it.

Even my brand name electric shaver, a name that was usually associated with excellence suffered the same fate. I went to replace the shaving block and screen; two small components, and found that the cost to do so was only $10 under buying the whole darned unit! After this happened a couple of times, I decided I no longer wanted to play this game and went back to shaving with a razor.

Another trick used by manufacturers is replacement dates - recommending replacements long before the part is anywhere near worn out. Using the shaver example, the manufacturer recommends replacing the screen and block every 12 months. They even provide a sticker to put on the razor to remind you of the date. While the parts may be engineered to only last that amount of time, careful use could extend their life, so it's just another way for the manufacturer to remind you when it's time to buy, buy, buy.

The cost of planned obsolescence not only hits the consumer hard in the wallet, but also our environment and millions of components are thrown away each year; usually winding up in landfill, not to mention the wasted resources that go into making junk.

Planned obsolescence became more popular in the 50's when price was everything; but I think we've got to the stage now with it that many consumers are happy to pay a few dollars more in order to get a better product that lasts longer

How do we change this trend?

Planned obsolescence is somewhat a runaway train now unfortunately. There is little that we can do as individuals except to write to companies asking them to improve their quality and that we are prepared to pay more if they do so. If enough people take this action, maybe things will change.

The other thing we can do is to treat manufacturer replacement date recommendations with suspicion, unless of course it's a safety issue.

Additionally, when something seems broken or depleted, use the power of the web to find alternatives or perhaps a cheap fix - a great example are the ink cartridges I mentioned earlier. Instead of throwing these environmental nasties out, you can buy refill kits that will save you a ton of cash and literally help save tons of cartridges going into landfill.

Finally, and the most important thing we can do is to look after the stuff we own a little better. Items tend to wear out faster if they aren't maintained and we've generally become lazy.

Gone are the days of manufacturers providing us with oodles of information for maintenance, unless of course it's going to make them money. Little things like lubricating, dusting or tightening a loose screw can extend the life of the products we buy, saving us money and also saving just that little bit more trash entering the waste stream before it really needs to.




Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Related Articles

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Archived/older comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Tasha)

    Hi,

    Great article as usual. I totally agree. We bought a new Hoover washing machine 5 years ago for 250GBP, and at the beginning of this year, the motor and/or brushes wore out. To replace them, including labour, would have cost 200GBP. This time we've spent 3 times what we paid for the Hoover on a Miele with a 10 year parts and labour guarantee. It was a tough choice to out the old machine, and we felt really guilty - we even tried to Freecycle it, but no-one wanted it - but there was no guarantee that the machine would last longer than another 18 months, so we felt that in the long run this was the best decision. For advice on washing machines a good website is: http://www.washerhelp.co.uk/ That's where we got our info from.

    I think it should be illegal for companies to design products to break after a given length of time and that they should face criminal charges for doing so.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Tasha, thanks for your input. We had a similar experience with a vacuum cleaner. We bought a big brand name at a discount price with all the trimmings and within 2 years the unit was totally screwed - it basically just fell apart. On my next purchase, I told the sales guy I wanted durability, not gimmicks and he recommended a Miele. While it didn't have all the gadgets and was a little pricier, it's solid, quiet, not as energy hungry and the darned thing could suck start a Harley Davidzon! Miele (German brand I think?) certainly gets a thumbs up from me.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by David)

    I know that Annie Leonard has been mentioned on related posts (i.e. hyper-consumption), but I don't see her mentioned here. So I'll go ahead and take the opportunity to promote "The Story of Stuff" (www.storyofstuff.com) as a valuable source for another perspective on planned obsolescence, perceived obsolescence and hyper-consumption, or as Annie puts it "the golden arrow of consumption in the materials economy"
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Thanks David; Annie's video on consumption is certainly a must see - just describes planned and perceived obsolescenc so well.
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Mark Duncan)

    I've had a similar experience with one DVD player and one DVD recorder. In a very short time they failed to recognize blank or commercially recorded DVDs.

    I checked the manufacturers website and found no help. I did web searches and found lots of people with the same problem but no solutions until I finally found one where the writer suggested opening the unit up and cleaning the lens and it worked perfectly.

    So, if dirt is the problem and can make you throw away an entire DVD player, why don't manufacturers make it easier to access the lens for routine cleaning?
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Sheila)

    Great article, Michael!

    I do alot of pondering on how to further my ability to make a difference in my country's ill- perceived notion that once something is thrown away, it disappears- just yesterday the phrase " designed obsolescence" would not escape me. How ironic is it that THIS is the first opportunity that I've had to read this issue?

    My daughter bought a flat- top stove last year- it was broken by her cat, who decided that he needed to brush against the pasta jar above it, subsequently knocking it down onto the range top and shattering it. Since she did not buy a warranty, she could not get anyone to fix it for a reasonable price- then she found out in order to fix the range top, she would have to spend just about as much money as she would've had to if she bought an entirely new one! She bought a new one, much to my chagrin. When the new stove was only three months old, the cooktop would not turn off and actually burned hotter and hotter. The only way she was able to turn the unit off was to unplug it from the wall. Last week a service repairman came to her home to fix it (this is after she went without a stove for a month) only to be told that he needed to order some parts, sorry Ma'am, you'll have to wait longer. What a crock!

    My friend's vehicle just flat out DIED when she finished paying it off. My Dremel rotary tool can only be fixed by two factories in America, and the repair cost is almost as much as buying another one!

    In order to change my cell phone plan a few years ago, I was told that my phone was too old (even though it was working just fine for me) and that I could not increase my minutes without buying a new one.Absurd.

    I could list scenario after scenario, but I think you get it. The biggest problem that I have with perceived obsolescence is that it is a ploy to develop an "in" crowd- and those who don't have the newest gadgets or clothing or whatever are then judged as not being as good as those who do have them. (For instance, Sarah Palin's $150,000 wardrobe- kind of un-funny that the Republican National Committee deemed it necessary in the midst of an economic crisis)

    The biggest problem I have with designed obsolescence is that this is a premeditated and deliberate method to legally rip a company's own customers off while smiling in their foolish faces because they know you will be back for more. With the first yawns of the Industrial Revolution, products were being made to last.

    Unfortunately between then and now, the "innocence of the Renaissance" was lost and greed became king when companies realized that they would make lots more when people had to replace the items they sell.

    It's just disgusting that a consumer cannot openly trust any business that they interact with, and that there is (or should be)a seed of doubt experienced by most smart people when pondering such an interaction. It is a most abominable practice and should absolutely be criminally prosecuted.

    Big business should be held to account worldwide and I'm glad that more people are becoming ever- more aware of the damages that are being incurred by our planet in the name of the greed of a few. For what? So they can have fun at all of our expense? I resent the fact that big business has the ability to practically rape and sicken their customers, poor indigenous people around the world, entire ecosystems, and the Mother Earth herself. Percieved obsolescence needs new perceptions.

    Designed obsolescence needs a new design. If business wasn't taken over by hugely greedy appetites, perhaps the world wouldn't be experiencing the economic crisis we are going through while the ones who created the mess get to fly in their private jets with pretty plastic girls and say, " What recession?"

    I know that this may be a bit racy, but I am echoing the sentiments of many average Americans who want nothing more than simplicity and a quiet, green life.

    Again, thank you for your crusade. It is certainly refreshing to receive candid information that is not propagandized by big business, i.e., "Plastic saves lives". Ha!
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Phil)

    You have stated here one of the main roots of our modern problems. We can all learn to live more simply and maintain the gains from the industrial revolution, if only we can fix things.

    Here in Hungary is a long history of use until there is no use left from the past. Recently that is changing as Western products are percieved as better, slicker, but almost impossible to economicly repair.

    We need desparately to have legislation against planned obsolesence. Even in one small country would help, as we could all look online to see the withdrawn models.

    Do we really need growth? Why make more products so more people can have jobs in factories when independant repair is better for the environment and personal development?

    The stock market is the real culprit, not capitalism. It is an aberation of a basicly good philosophy that allows some to gamble on the efforts of others enhancing both success and failure!
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by Thomas Bailey)

    I had a (then) 30-year-old bike, which I enjoyed riding until it got stolen. The bike I have now is only 9 months old and already had to have the rear wheel replaced twice, as well as a pedal. I have cooked on a 50-year-old stove, and have come across YouTube videos of organs from the 19th century and earlier in excellent condition, including one in Switzerland built in the 1300's, completely playable. San Francisco has 120-year-old cable cars and 60-year-old streetcars in active use, all part of MUNI.
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Sylvio Perreault)

    I appreciate your post, it hopefully will be read by many who need to have their eyes opened to what is going on in our world. I am a goldsmith by trade and used to cast replacement parts for friends that had been made of nylon in brass(or bronze). My replacement parts were never in need of replacing even by the time they sold their vehicles.
    I also was in the military and in 1976 was issued a used pair of combat boots which I had for 20yrs after and were still in very useable condition by the time I gave them to my brother in 1983/84. Just regular maintenance with silicone kept them going. Now that is the type of quality I have learned to appreciate.
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by Bobby J)

    we have to keep this in mind the next time someone say that humans are a virus on this earth. the corporations and not the average person are the problem. as you see the fine people that commented here would be in the majority if left to our own good will. never underestimate the conditioning of the media and Madison ave.
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by Rick Hamell)

    So... what is the solution? Brands that were once good brands and could be counted on to last forever no longer are.


     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by sleeper)

    Are there good brands anymore? Must I visit a blacksmith to get a good product? I compared an item purchased online with the "same" thing at Walmart and was disturbed to find the Walmart version was made of warped, flimsy plastic as opposed to the one I bought that was made of solid stuff. Same brand, different store. It's crazy!
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by Mark)

    I think there's 2 new laws that we need governments to implement to help change things around.
    1. Products should have minimum lifespan, so for electrical goods they should be expected to last at least 5 years to begin with and over time as companies have improved their products this minimum lifespan can be increased further.
    2. Any new product brought to market needs to be better for the environment than its previous incarnation. Companies know that humans are a sucker for convenience and that effectively convenience trumps environmentalism. We need to switch the focus of designers so that new stuff can still be more convenient it's just that it would have to be greener than before.

    We can't expect the world to become greener overnight, but I think that by weeding out the bad options slowly it won't seem like a huge burden on anyone.
     
  • Comment #14 (Posted by Daphne)

    I hate how goods don't last anymore!! I bought a Westinghouse fridge 4 years ago and it has stopped working. I rang the shop I bought it from and the response was " it only comes with 2years warranty, things aren't made to last anymore" I just can't believe that I spent nearly $600 four years ago for nothing!!
    I will never forget the year I noticed that all the winter clothes weren't thick anymore. it was like theyd been shaved but were still the same price. it just makes me furious and feel exploited.

     
  • Comment #15 (Posted by chris Bourke)

    I think that the only way to fight this is for people to contact manufacturers and tell them that there is a desperate need for items that have a guaranteed long life and if promoted correctly this would be in the manufacturers best interest commercially.
    I have noticed too that the electrical cords in a lot of toasters, irons etc. have wire in them that is very thin and so is more liable to twist,kink and break, and although the item itself is in working order it must then be discarded.
     
  • Comment #16 (Posted by Jill Thompson)

    Hey everyone. I've been stewing on this planned obsolescence thing, and trying to think of a solution. One idea is to help people / consumers recognize which companies give a crap if they leave you spending your life in Return lines. I was thinking of trying to get a campaign going for "Time-back Guarantees". i.e. If a product breaks, the company will not only replace my product (or money) they will pay me a significant sum for wasting a portion of my life while I shop for, install/assemble/ try out / repackage / return their product. It would be a signal to consumers, and a disincentive to companies to sell crap. What do you think? Am I on to anything? I'm just a frustrated mom so I don't how to get there, but I'm willing to throw some energy into the idea if it has legs.
     
  • Comment #17 (Posted by Jobert)

    I recommend the company Patagonia for clothing. I guess I should hedge this by saying that I believe they still offer it, but when I bought a coat there in 2007, they have a guarantee that you can send it back for mending if needed. Any holes, or worn out elbows, and they will fix it and return it for the life of the item. The coat was expensive, but with a guarantee like that, it is worth it. It may also pay to look into North Face. I think they had a deal like that, but I'm not sure.

    Chaco is a disappointment. They essentially sold out and their products are made in China now. I'm not sure about the lifetime warranty.

    Thanks for a great article. I am giving a workshop on simple lifestyle and plan to share this article and site with the participants.
     
  • Comment #18 (Posted by Paul Vincent)

    Funny how businesses have begun to think that planned obsolescence is in their best interest. I bought a
    very pricey tablesaw from Sears, a company who was noted for selling good quality products and offering an even better warranty. This practice is why at one point in time they were responsible for 1% of GNP for the United States. I had a friend who had owned Craftsman tablesaw that still worked from the 1960's. So after a year of good service from the tablesaw I decided I needed a bandsaw also. Soon after a started getting vibration from the saw, then the shaft broke. $500 saw that lasts
    a little over a year. Then problems with the bandsaw.
    Well Sears, you are correct I will have to buy another tablesaw and a bandsaw! But guess what? Not only will I not purchase another Craftsman power tool, I would not buy your lawn mower, any appliance you sell, or anything that you sell with your name on it. I plan to make you obsolscent from any future purchase!
     
  • Comment #19 (Posted by Rita André)

    What a useful and highly informative blog you have mister Michael, I'm going to share this website on my blog (ritavegan.blogspot.com), and thank you very much for this article, I was looking for some research material on this subject for quite some days!

    Hugs,
    Rita.
     
  • Comment #20 (Posted by KarmicAngel)

    I couldn't agree more, Michael, especially about Perceived obsolescence and the dates things expire. Our culture that makes us actually FEEL BAD for not competing for NOT getting the newer shiny version of the perfectly good product we have is why I started a new blog! Those are two topics I intend to explore in my next blog post. I'd love comments as well, if you are interested!
    http://planningforobsolescence.wordpress.com
     
Comment submission link (no longer in use - please use new form above)