Tips categories
Articles with tips for going green to help protect the environment we all affect!
 
Renewable energy - solar power, wind energy and hot water
 
Special offer
NEW - Green Deal Of The Day! Save 50 - 90% on earth friendly products!
::
Buy castile soap and save! Learn more about uses for eco friendly castile soap
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. Brown rice vs white rice
  2. Hydrogen peroxide tips
  3. Uses for eucalyptus oil
  4. Handy borax tips
  5. Recycling styrofoam
  6. White sugar vs raw sugar
  7. Castile soap
  8. 30 baking soda tips
  9. White bread vs brown bread
  10. 24 handy lemon tips
No popular articles found.
Get involved!
Feel free to add comments to tips and blog posts & build on the information or click here to submit new earth friendly tips and environmental news items!
 
Green Living Tips on Twitter
 
Green Living Tips on Facebook

 
bookmark or share this page
 »  Home  »  food  »  Stevia - sugar alternative
Stevia - sugar alternative
By Green Living Tips | Published  01/24/2011 | food , family
A natural alternative to sugar - Stevia

(First published May 2007, updated January 2011)

If you're looking to get away from sugar for health or environmental reasons; Stevia might be a great ultra-low calorie, more earth-friendly alternative for you.

The demand for cane sugar has seen vast swathes of land degraded over centuries. According to the WWF, sugar cultivation has been responsible for considerable soil erosion, habitat destruction, pesticide and herbicide poisoning of water and eutrophication caused by nutrient and waste runoff. Refining of sugar also presents environmental issues - see my article on white sugar vs. raw sugar.

For most people, it's health and dieting issues that lead them to use sugar alternatives; and the products most often turned to are aspartame and saccharin. Aspartame is the chemical most widely used now, present in large quantities in diet soda and many other processed foods.

In regards to saccharin; one of its components is phthalic acid. Aside from being a sweetener ingredient, phthalic acid is used in plasticizers and for surface coatings. It's a substance that has created considerable water pollution in China. Saccharin has already been banned in some countries.

Aspartame doesn't appear to directly create environmental problems; but when ingested; it breaks down into aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol. Phenylaline can cause problems for some sensitive people, but methanol is the bigger concern. The methanol breaks down further into formaldehyde, then to formic acid, both known carcinogens. It poisons us and what we excrete poisons the environment.

The major concern with aspartame is the scale of its use. If you take a close look at the ingredients in many of the food items in your cupboards, and not just sweet items, you may be surprised to see how many contain aspartame.

The health problems associated with aspartame are currently being hotly debated. Aspartame is big business and there are many powerful players keen to see that it remains that way.

There are many more natural alternatives to cane sugar including Brazzein, Curculin, Erythritol, Fructose, Glycyrrhizin, Glycerol, Isomalt, Lactitol, Mabinlin, Maltitol, Mannitol, Miraculin, Monellin , Pentadin, Sorbitol, Stevia, Tagatose, Thaumatin and Xylitol. Most of the names of those sound fairly frightening, but many are derived from fruit and plants, including Stevia.

Stevia, which is also known as sweetleaf, honeyleaf or sugarleaf is a herb from South America that is said to be a couple of hundred times sweeter weight for weight compared with cane sugar. To put that into context, a teaspoon of refined Stevia powder is about the same as a cup of sugar in terms of sweetening ability. It contains no calories and refined Stevia products have no bitter after-taste.
 
Stevia is not a new discovery, it's been in use by the Guarini Indians of Paraguay for medicinal and sweetening purposes for 1500 years and has been used extensively for decades in Japan.
 
When I originally published this article back in 2007, some countries still weren't permitting its use as a sweetener - including Australia; so I had a very pleasant surprise to see a Stevia product sitting in our kitchen  a couple of weeks ago. It seems that Stevia was approved for use here in 2008. Stevia was also approved as a food sweetener the USA in the same year - it was previously allowed only under the classification "dietary supplement". In Canada, it's a available as a dietary supplement.

It seems the European Union is still deciding the acceptable daily intake for Stevia before approving it there.

Stevia is available as whole leaf, ground leaf, powders or a liquid extract; but in regards to the powder/liquid form; check the ingredients - sometimes other nasty chemicals can accompany it and to create liquid extract I understand to be quite an energy intensive process. The liquid and powder forms are the most potent, but even whole Stevia leaves are 20 to 30 times sweeter than cane sugar (but these may have somewhat of a licorice or slightly bitter after-taste)

Unlike aspartame, Stevia is stable when heated, so it can be used in a wide range of recipes requiring cooking.

Stevia is a member of the chrysanthemum family and a herb that can grow in poor soils. Stevia is a subtropical perennial and is a little water intensive, but given its potency it may be a plant that could be well suited to your own garden. Imagine having your "sugar" hit growing out in your back yard! Stevia plants have also been observed to have insect repelling tendencies - so it could be a perfect companion plant for an organic garden.

So there you have it - a seemingly healthier and more environmentally friendly solution for your sweet tooth that can also assist with pest control in your garden!

Oh, and it's nice to be able to finally state that it tastes great!




Michael Bloch
Green Living Tips.com
Article reproduction guidelines
 
Related Articles

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Archived/older comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by gleed)

    Stevia requires careful concern before use. The Food Standards agency (UK) states:


    " The data considered by the Committee indicated that the extract has the potential to produce adverse effects in the male reproductive system that could affect fertility and that a metabolite produced by the human gut microflora, steviol, is genotoxic (ie. damages DNA).

    The Committee concluded that stevioside was not acceptable as a sweetener. "

    Not permitted for use in food stuffs in UK and EU....

    http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/multimedia/webpage/stevia
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Caleb Goodwin)

    The E.U. now allows the use of stevia as a supplement
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Michael Bloch [Green Living Tips])

    Hi Caleb, thanks for that info! Could you tell me where you discovered that?
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Susan)

    from drugs.com: http://www.drugs.com/npp/stevia.html

    Stevia has been shown to not be mutagenic or genotoxic. One report indicates that constituents of stevioside and steviol are not mutagenic in vitro. Stevioside was found to be nontoxic in acute toxicity studies in a variety of laboratory animals. Chronic administration of stevia to male rats had no effect in fertility vs. controls. Another report concludes that stevioside in high doses affected neither growth nor reproduction in hamsters of both sexes.
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Hi Susan, thanks for that information :)
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Rosie)

    We live in South Korea and bought a Stevia plant about 5 months ago. The plant has grown a lot and has very pretty white flowers. It's potted indoors and gets a few hours of sunlight from the window.

    We haven't gotten to the point of replacing sugar for cooking uses (I mainly use sugar for making jam) but when we make a fruit salad or a dessert we'll mix the leaves in or put it on top for a delicious garnish. My husband even adds it (and mint leaves) to green salads.

    We haven't noticed any strange flavors as listed in the article. On the contrary, even my student will ask if he can eat some. He's a 13 year old boy, and what teenage boy likes to eat greens?

    Out of all the herbs I grow, that's the one that we eat the most often, both because it grows faster with more leaves and because it tastes great!
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    Hi Rosie, great to hear from someone who has used Stevia - thanks for sharing those tips!
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by Pamela Schmidt)

    I changed from white to raw sugar many years ago, but then I discovered stevia about three years ago. I use the powdered variety. It is so powerfully sweet that if I want to sweeten just a cup of something to drink I take a dry teaspoon and dip it into the powder and shake off the excess! I also use it in cooking (especially stewed fruit) and am learning to replace the sugar in all my recipes. The secret seems to be to use it very sparingly.

    Stevia has been a great find for me as I cannot stand the taste of saccharin or aspartame. I'd rather have NO sweetener than to partake of those ingredients which leave a terrible aftertaste and are health threatening.


     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Michael - Green Living Tips)

    That's great info Pamela - thanks!
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by Stacy)

    I have been using stevia in powdered form for about 4 years now and I love it. I concur with Pamelas comments. The only time I have found that it has a licorice-like taste to it is if I slipped and put a bit too much in my tea.
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by Ernst)

    Thanks! I was looking for non-carbohydrate sweeteners and I found this website. I had a great question: why there aren't lots of researches trying to find healthiest alternative sweeteners and replace the classical white sugar and the another aspartate-based sweeteners. The excess of sugar intake is related to a lot of diseases!!! Now I have the answer: as I suposed, there is a huge food industry behind the sugar and related additives... What a sweet world we have! The only we can do is try to moderate our sugar intake and that of our children, because they're more exposed!
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by Sheila)

    Alright, Michael- this is my last blog for the day. Your site is so laced with sweet articles I cannot help but indulge (pun fully intended).
    On sugar, saccharin, and aspartame... it's amazing that we again are looking to ancient ways to solve modern scourge. It's simply a shame that with all of our modern advancements that we really have not become all that much smarter. Sugar cane production and growth have damaged vast areas of wetlands in the name of plantation owners' greed in USA- now we are in the midst of the largest plague of diabetes, obesity and pancreatic cancer to date. Stevia could be used to reverse alot of that damage in our subtropics, and I'm sure that even the sweetest sweettooth out there couldn't dislike its super- sweetness.
    The stevia leaf, according to your article, has been used by Guarini Indians for 1500 years and by the Japanese for decades- yet there are companies out there who would propagandize against it and cite mutagenic dangers as the reason for not approving it through the FDA. Why? Again, it comes down to the financial interests of companies vs. the greater good of humanity. Why would one need a study of the stevia leaf if there is perfectly legitimate proof that it does not pose a danger to humans in the Guarini Indians who have taken it for over 1,000 years? If the leaf was harmful, don't you think after 1,500 years they would have figured it out by now? The Japanese have a profoundly lower cancer rate than Americans, and this is even after Nagasaki and Hiroshima, and they use it! Why is it that everything we do seems to have to be approved by the powers that be (A.K.A. "Big Business") when we would be much better off just being allowed to render our own judgement in our own lives? Most of us do not want to harm ourselves or others and do exercise good judgement in avoiding harm, but for some reason it has been deemed necessary that we have a regulatory system out there that allows us only to consume what they deem safe- diabetes/ obesity/ cancer is a huge industry! We wouldn't want to screw up the medical industry with the stevia leaf, would we? ;)Unless, of course, it was GM adapted, that way the medical community can continue to flourish from food- bourne health consequences... and the food businesses can claim ownership on yet another plant that should be a fundamental human right to pursue. It's absurd that such a free country does not realize exactly how controlled we are and how much freedom is given away every day to new laws and new regulatory commissions, right down to the food we eat and the drugs we take. What's even more absurd is the fact that we Americans do it to ourselves. Enjoy your soyburger!
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by Jennifer)

    I recently changed over to Stevia Extract in the Raw. I find that this brand tastes much better than Truvia, which is what I've been using. It's most definitely very sweet so one packet is perfect for tea or coffee. I was using Splenda for a long time but I always haf to put 2 of them in my drink. Stevia Extract in the Raw is from the makers of Sugar in the Raw. It's all natural! You should definitely go out and try it :) If you can't find it at your local grocery store, you can purchase it online (like I do). Check out www.steviaextractintheraw.com :)
     
  • Comment #14 (Posted by michele)

    I have been reasearching and using stevia for a while now and have also found that all stevia products are not created eaqual.I was so happy when I saw the ads for Truvia and thought how nice it would be to be able to get my stevia right off the store shelf.I was overjoyed that finally the word about stevia would finally reach so many households.Then I read in an internet article that Truvia is my by the same company that makes Coca-Cola.I don't know about you but that in itself was enough to set off the warning bells for me!This article stated that if this product were not adulterated in some way,it could not be patented.Always CHECK YOUR INGREDIENTS! If you see something you're not familiar with,just type it in a search box somewhere and FIND OUT WHAT IT IS!Be informed so that you can make the right choices for you and the people you love.
     
  • Comment #15 (Posted by slywlf)

    I have been using Stevia in various forms (including growing my own) for several years, and am completely happy with it. I even used it yesterday to make hot spiced chocolate, using soy milk (cow milk allergy), cinnamon and a bit of chili powder, and it came out delectable! Even hubby uses it in his coffee now ;-)
     
  • Comment #16 (Posted by franceska)

    I am glad to read that Stevia can be used in cooking. I have several boxes that were $2 and I had a $2 coupon. I don't sweeten tea or coffee and wasn't sure how extensively I could use it. Also leery about the purity of grocery store Stevia. This brand is Purevia and will heed Michele's warning to check out the other ingredients.
    It's in little packets. Any idea of the ratio of exchange when replacing sugar in recipes?
     
  • Comment #17 (Posted by Evvie)

    Stevia is almost a household name here in Uruguay, at least for those who have is o have someone with diabetes, for instance.
    It became available a few years ago, firstly in the form of Splenda, though is a bit pricey!
    Now you can find it at naturist shops mainly in its dried plant form, and is much cheaper.
    Another presentation, though not good for diabetics, is a sweetner which is part white cane sugar and part stevia: 1 teaspoons of this sweetner equals 3 teaspoons of white sugar, and is not so expensive. And it was very well advertised that is not for diabetics. I think it is a good idea for transitioning from sugar to stevia.
     
Comment submission link (no longer in use - please use new form above)